Living in the age of self-absorption, it is reflexive to feel cynical about
the value of further self-examination, but there is an enormous difference
between being self-centered and being self-aware. It is an experiential
distinction that warrants clarification, at about the time a child learns
to read. Self-absorption is a rabid social epidemic. In contrast, self-awareness
is a body of knowledge whose existence is in constant peril. The experiences
and artifacts that can potentially build self-awareness may be nonchalantly
pushed to the margins of our awareness or, worse, lost altogether. Irreplaceable
windows into children's deeper selves lies submerged in their art, writing,
assessments, journals, photos, and projects of all kinds.
The risk of lost self-knowledge is compounded by the malleability of our
social selves. If your son, daughter, or students virtually live on Facebook
(a preoccupation which a group of British boys playfully described to me
as an "essential waste of time"), then they are accustomed to
a shifting notion of self -and the freedom to reconstruct their identities
from one day to the next. This is the garden variety postmodern experience
we have cultivated, and which is accelerated by electronica. Young people
live as though they are fully capable of changing their social selves with
a click of a button, from one moment to the next, and without harm to their
core beings.
Our societies currently tend to celebrate reinvention, portraying only
the positive aspects of this role-play. We have amnesia for what is lost
and take every opportunity to flee from what we cannot change. Adolescents,
in particular, are anxious to shed their "childish" selves, even
as they will need to revisit these archetypal dimensions of self as they
mature. These threads of personal history are trails of evidence leading
to life's ultimate destination - oneself.
The impulse of the emerging generation is to drift away from an enduring,
stable self that is resistant to reconstruction. At this moment in our cultural
history, personhood seems confined to existing only in the present moment,
oblivious to personal history, and how that history establishes a continuity
of being.
This instinct may be partially adaptive. We are, after all, in the last
phases of a human psychology driven by the belief that wellness depends
on our ability to shed the wounds of the past. Perhaps, then, it is no wonder
that last vestige of this transition would be to shed the past altogether.
Yet this change of course is not without consequence, one being that a larger
conception of personhood has gone underground, and is in desperate need
of resurrection.
Why?
Because the essence of growing up involves growing into yourself. As much
as youth inspires us to believe that this self is of our own choosing, life
suggests otherwise. This is not commentary on either genetics or social
status. Here, I am talking about our psychological reality - the idea that
a kernel of our deeper selves is present from the earliest years of our
lives, and awareness of the shape of that being is pivotal to our transformation
into adults. Absent this self-knowledge, we are destined to be stuck in
a perpetual adolescence.
It is only through encounter with one's enduring self that a young person
can make the essential ascent from self-absorption to self-knowledge. This
ascent marks the shift from living in a state of subjectivity to one of
objectivity - the psychological architecture of maturity. Without this shift,
adolescence is prolonged indefinitely. We could conceivably end up with
an entire generation confined to the relativism of an ever-shifting self
- a people without specific roots or destiny.
At life's most critical moments knowledge of self is more valuable than
gold. It is within that body of knowledge that we make decisions reflecting
our core values, interests, and needs. This is the foundation of living
a congruent life, and is of the utmost importance in the age of Facebook.
Our cultures celebrate makeovers, new beginnings, and the cult of personality
but what of the perennial need for authenticity? Through what other means
are young people to hear the call of their individual destinies? Is it possible
that the fixation on a malleable self is a circular manifestation of immaturity,
that grows little more than a mirror image of its own reality?
Where Does Self-knowledge Come From?
There are countless life experiences that inform a young person's self-awareness,
yet there are also a host of artifacts which comprise a useful history
in this regard. My concern is that many of those artifacts may be misplaced
or lost over time, leading to unnecessarily fragmented personal histories.
I recognize that families save objects of sentimental value, but there
is so much more that can be useful to a child navigating his or her journey
to selfhood - even though it may not be until the dawn of adolescence
that the value of those objects is revealed. And if those artifacts assume
only a digitized form, they will be of considerably less value. It is
imperative that our histories exist in real space and time as a counterpoint
to the cult of self-relativism that pervades 21st century life.
I have found a particularly receptive audience for this initiative at girls'
schools I have recently visited, but see no reason why self-knowledge
would be of any less value to boys. My current research involvement with
the International
Boys' Schools Coalition is ample proof - the world is populated with
vast numbers of boys eager to contextualize their personal experiences in
pursuit of knowing their destiny. If you want to know those thoughts, you
need only ask them to "dance." Both genders are eager and ready
to engage this avenue of self-growth now.
It may not be altogether fashionable or contemporary to advocate for a
more static conception of self in the year 2010, but some degree of permanence
in a child's life is stabilizing. It represents security, and provides
the existential gravity that allows one to grow and evolve free of the anxiety
that such experimentation might threaten the integrity and wholeness
of one's enduring self. While the notion of boundless plasticity might seem
exciting, especially for those young enough to be in the throes of emergence,
it is an ascent without summit for someone who needs to find their way toward
the more objective maturity of adulthood.
[Those who subscribe to the "let children be children" school
of thought might well object to the preceding. But in fact the very premise
of self-knowledge is to honor the psychology of childhood as being worthy
of a more complete record. This can be accomplished at the same time that
we place that record in a larger life context. Narrative and context facilitate
the adolescent passage, and help the young to embrace the reality that growing
up is merely becoming a more complete version of who you already are. It
is a process that should be anchored by joy rather than fear, by fulfillment
rather than compromise.]
In my recent talks and consultations with schools, I have discussed the
value of a self-knowledge archive comprised of a variety of projects that
a student has done from early childhood through adolescence. These projects
should not be assigned with the understanding that they would be part of
a self-knowledge archive, because such self-consciousness would undermine
the potential revelations implicit in the archive projects. However, over
time, and with periodic examination of the archive's contents, this work
promises to heighten self-awareness in formative ways.
For very young children, the archive could be made up of a variety of creative
works such as drawings or their early attempts at formulating stories. For
older children, these creative works may have a higher degree of complexity,
and could include photographs, artwork, journals, and other types of school
work that map the trek toward self-understanding.
I should alert you to the fact that it is impossible to anticipate how
such works will inform a person's self-understanding. If such effects were
a foregone conclusion, the artifacts would be of far less value. The vitality
of a self-knowledge archive springs from its dynamic portrayal of a self-in-progress.
When the contents of this archive are viewed in chronological order with
an eye toward scanning for the deeper forms, ideas, and expressions that
punctuate a person's history, the shapes of an enduring self can finally
be seen and acknowledged for what they are - the seeds of individual destiny.
Digging for these seeds has a substantial history in psychology but can
still be a bit intimidating. So much so that adults who have not done
this exploration in their own lives may be hesitant to encourage it among
those younger. In his thought provoking book, Nature
and the Human Soul, author
Bill Plotkin pinpoints the situation: "The descent that adolescents
must undergo is what most scares people about teenagers (including teenagers
themselves). But this is also what grieves many older people, because,
somewhere inside, they know this is where they needed to go as teens but
didn't, and the question still hovers the in air in front of them as to
whether it is too late."
At the outset of such an endeavor, particularly with respect to young children,
the task might feel a bit arduous and uncertain. However, I can assure you
that the meaning of the journey will become crystal clear at the moment
when the journey is most relevant, and this is generally during the adolescent
passage.
We need a set of artifacts that guide us toward more sophisticated self-knowledge
than what we can cull from peers and online personality tests. These artifacts
are necessary to be confident of ourselves and the decisions we make about
where to steer our lives. These artifacts may be present in scrapbooks or
tucked in drawers and cabinets at home, but in this over-consuming, disposable,
and electronic era they need a more permanent repository in order for their
narrative power to accrue and serve the individual who has created them.
Personal Histories Need an Archive
Although a self-knowledge archive might be kept at home as well as school,
I believe that school is a child's primary community and, as such, is
the best place to keep such an archive. When children attend the same
school from early years through the completion of secondary school, it
is easier to maintain such an archive, but the archive can be begun at
any time and can travel from one school to another. When the archive is
begun in later childhood or adolescence, things that were created during
earlier childhood can be collected and placed in the archive as they are
found.
Those of you who follow this newsletter have likely read about Project
360°, which is attached as a link at the end of this newsletter. I believe
that Project 360° is an excellent starting point for a self-knowledge
archive begun during middle school. A self-assessment focused on cognitive
capabilities (such as the Eight Pillars of executive function) is also a
valuable component of a self knowledge archive. The archive need not be
comprised only of expressive work, it can also include work that is related
to cognitive performance, academic talent, and extracurricular skills. All
of these artifacts reflect cornerstone's of a person's enduring self - the
rock upon which they will stand to map the terrain ahead.
Working with Generational Differences
Societies often spend inordinate amounts of time fighting against the
tendencies of a generation in the name of tradition or moral conceptions
of what is "right." The current generation, sometimes referred
to as "generation me," or the trophy generation, has a natural
inclination to focus on itself. Rather than trying to combat that focus
on moral grounds, we should take advantage of this generational phenomenon
by turning these self-scrutinizing minds toward a huge, life-changing
result - self-realizations that stand the test of time.
Self-knowledge helps facilitate the most valuable psychological transition
in all of childhood and adolescence - the capacity to move from subjectivity
to objectivity. This perceptual shift is the quintessence of what it means
to move from the mind of a child to the mind of an effective adult. No one
can master this jump in one simple step, or even in a few short years. It
is an awareness that needs to be unfolded over time, and one which will
require the input of a community: fellow travelers (other students), teachers,
mentors, and even those unfamiliar with the person in question.
When it comes time for the self-knowledge archive to be examined by others,
it should be done in a respectful way, and without judgment. The archive
is a repository of self rather than personal achievements. It is not competitive.
It should in fact convey just the opposite - that personal histories have
an inherent equivalence because those histories are a record rather than
a report card. To judge those records would be akin to rating the value
of various birth certificates. And to paraphrase Carl Jung, the quest of
life is for wholeness, not perfection.
Bearing witness to one's own history, and especially those aspects of self
that are enduring is a game-changer for those old enough to begin connecting
the dots. When you are an adolescent you operate as though all of the
valuable things you know about yourself and your world have been learned
in the last 30 days. It is a tremendous surprise, and ultimately reassuring, to see
that you, as a whole person, has been taking shape for years. Who you are
is more than the music you like, the people you love, or the or the Facebook
page you've created. You are the subject of a story that has been written
line by line since birth.
You may sense in this newsletter an idea that is underscored in many of
my thoughts of the past few years - the proposition that the very purpose
of school warrants reconsideration. Clearly, schools have a responsibility
to educate children, but what of the value of nurturing those same children's
deeper selves? When I meditate on the definition of a school I can find
no more succinct answer than a school is a community. One responsibility
of that community is to educate its members, but another fundamental responsibility
is to raise and protect its members. I certainly hope international conversation
about this responsibility moves beyond talk of bullying prevention and the
nutritional value of school lunches. In the midst of addressing these important
day-to-day concerns, there is another narrative of greater long-term consequence.
It is the story of individuals coexisting within a world whose nature is
to homogenize rather than differentiate. As the stewards of this unfolding
narrative, our collective responsibility is to help keep the individual
stories of human beings intact until the formative chapters have been written,
and the young are old enough to remember who they are. |